dc.contributor.author | Statens vegvesen | |
dc.contributor.author | JHE/KSV | |
dc.coverage.spatial | Norway, E39 Bjørnafjorden | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-30T10:39:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-30T10:39:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-08-15 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2660041 | |
dc.description.abstract | This report contains the architectural evaluation done for the preferred alternative K12. In the process of ranking the mdifferent alternatives K11 to K14, architectural evaluations have played an important role. The K12 solution is found to be the superior compared to the others.
In addition, some visual improvements are proposed. These shall be evaluated in later phases of the project.
Please see enclosure 1 visualizations.
Enclosure 1 – 10205546-07-NOT-195 Architectural visualizations – K12 (15.08.2019) | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Statens vegvesen Vegdirektoratet | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Statens vegvesen | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Statens vegvesens rapporter; | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.subject | Statens vegvesen Vegdirektoratet | en_US |
dc.subject | E39 Bjørnafjorden | en_US |
dc.subject | SBJ-33-C5-AMC-90-RE-103 | en_US |
dc.title | Preferred solution, K12 – Appendix C - Architectural evaluation | en_US |
dc.type | Report | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 53 | en_US |